RE: Enercalc + Revit Aesur (Structural) 11 Aug 22 00:00 Can you speak to whether this is all based off of revit analytical elements vs. And there's a good bit of manual post processing before you can get your Risa model running. It's great for exporting shearwalls with a bunch of openings. And it allows you to choose whether to bring in the physical model or the analytical model. But simply importing geometry from Revit to Risa (risa floor or 3D) is pretty quick if you know what needs to be cleaned up prior to the export. But I've never tried to implement the 'round tripping' functionality to bring sizes back into Revit. I use the RISA > Revit link pretty often to get bigger models set up. Plus our drafters would pitch a fit if they had to keep track of both. I.e., moving a physical model element doesn't always move the analytical element. If so then that would be a bit of a drawback since we/I typically just ignore all the analytical stuff in Revit as it gets really messy really quick unless you're diligent. Not sure how I haven't seen this before.Īt first glance I suspect (I'm going to see if Enercalc will give me a trial) that all of this is based off of the analytical elements within Revit, as opposed to simply the physical elements. This actually looks pretty damn slick indeed.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |